Critical Evaluation of the Paper Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Critical Evaluation of the Paper - Case Study Example Viewed through a different lens, we can also see the author’s attempt to effortlessly move from theory to practice and back. This can be accomplished if practice dictates theoretical constructs that can be tested in different firms and industries. Another criterion that could enable this movement is the deconstruction of a complex subject into a well-ordered sequence. The author has been able to fulfill this through his 10-step procedure for strategic thinking. We would provide a balanced approach that hints towards the affirmative, yet there are some gaps that have not been addressed. To illustrate, let us look at Schoemaker where he says that his purpose is to provide a systematic methodology that would fashion a bridge between theory and practice. Whilst agreeing that the author has definitely provided a systematic methodology, there is no evidence of the academic theory that can be tested against the practice. In fact, the author makes no effort to state the key tenets of theory with regard to scenario planning. On the contrary, the paper abounds with several thoughtful instances drawn from practice, where organizational actors and organizations faced critical situations. Extending the answer to our question further, we also find that the author has omitted to explain the validity of his methodology to the context of the broader environment. In other words, we do not know whether the insights gained from these two companies are sufficient to provide an all-encompassing answer with regard to scenario planning.... The author has been able to fulfill this through his 10-step procedure for strategic thinking. Has the author been able to meet his stated purpose through this paper? We would provide a balanced approach that hints towards the affirmative, yet there are some gaps that have not been addressed. To illustrate, let us look at Schoemaker (1995 p.26) where he says that his purpose is to provide a systematic methodology that would fashion a bridge between theory and practice. Whilst agreeing that the author has definitely provided a systematic methodology, there is no evidence of academic theory that can be tested against practice. In fact, the author makes no effort to state the key tenets of theory with regard to scenario planning. On the contrary, the paper abounds with several thoughtful instances drawn from practice, where organizational actors and organizations faced critical situations. Extending the answer to our question further, we also find that the author has omitted to explain the validity of his methodology to the context of the broader environment. In other words, we do not know whether the insights gained from these two companies are sufficient to provide an all-encompassing answer with regard to scenario planning. We have evidence mainly from industry. There are two firms where the author has studied scenario planning. He has probably adopted the role of a facilitator or consultant in these two firms. Hence we can say that the author draws more upon primary research to enhance the credibility of his arguments. Notably, the author also makes select references to past events that transpired such as the attack of Pearl Harbor by the Japanese, the vast penetration of personal